| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090327113645.GC2585@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:36:45 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: TOMOYO in linux-next > > > As for the rest of the feedback, please work with the developers to fix > > > any bugs or lack of documentation. > > > > Which brings a question: given that kernel<->user interface is > > undocumented, how was this reviewed? > > By 15 iterative posts to lkml and LSM, with extensive discussion and > feedback, as well as presentations by the TOMOYO developers at various > conferences around the world. Yeah, 15 posts to lkml, largely ignored becuase the design problems seemed unfixable... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists