linux-kernel - Re: epoll_ctl and const correctness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49CD5E59.6030805@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:16:41 +0300
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	nicolas sitbon <nicolas.sitbon@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: epoll_ctl and const correctness

nicolas sitbon wrote:
> is it stupid to ask how a size can be negative? who is stupid? you're
> boring with my question, just tell me please how a size can be
> negative?

Yes I'm bored with your questions.  And am suggesting you to stop
asking me now.  That's enough.

As of size being negative - how one can read() negative number
of bytes for example?  How one can poll() waiting for a maximum
of negative number of milliseconds?

This is my last reply to you.  I have something more useful to do.

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/