[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090328002137.52558018@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:21:37 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netrom: zero length frame filtering in NetRom
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:28:23 +0000
>
> >
> > > + /* NetRom empty data frame has no meaning : ignore it */
> > > + if (copied == 0) {
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > Also broken - and doesn't follow the coding style either 8)
>
> Well, you send these turds to me and you're usually knowledgable
> in the amateur radio protocol area :-)
>
> I'll back them both out which is what I assume you want me to
> do.
Yes. Handling zero length frames with socket API is nasty and ugly but
unfortunately its a valid use of these protocols. I need to go read the
AF_ROSE docs to double check the situation with ROSE but the other two
definitely want backing out.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists