linux-kernel - Re: netrom: zero length frame filtering in NetRom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090327.172425.30448517.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netrom: zero length frame filtering in NetRom

From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:21:37 +0000

> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > I'll back them both out which is what I assume you want me to
> > do.
> 
> Yes. Handling zero length frames with socket API is nasty and ugly but
> unfortunately its a valid use of these protocols. I need to go read the
> AF_ROSE docs to double check the situation with ROSE but the other two
> definitely want backing out.

Ok, both reverted, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/