[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090330234539.GA3462@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:45:39 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joe Malicki <jmalicki@...acarta.com>,
Michael Itz <mitz@...acarta.com>,
Kenneth Baker <bakerk@...acarta.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid
sometimes doesn't)
Quoting Al Viro (viro@...IV.linux.org.uk):
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 03:40:40AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > > We can't proceed. If that another exec() fails, it will clear "under exec" at
> > > the end of do_execve(), before we kill other threads.
> >
> > Or we need a counter to mark/unmark.
>
> Nah, easier to have check_unsafe_exec() return -EAGAIN in cases we care
> about.
>
> Anyway, completely untested patchset is in
> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6.git/ execve-mess
> (the last 9 changesets of it).
>
> WARNING: that's *NOT* for merge at the moment; this is not a pull request.
>
> Review (and testing) would be welcome.
(note exactly *meaningful* review, but)
exit_fs() and daemonize_fs_struct() do:
if (--fs->users)
fs = NULL;
write_unlock(&fs->lock);
Moving the write_unlock up actually let's the kernel boot and
start running ltp.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists