[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1iqlqfu4m.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:50:17 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, jbeulich@...ell.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ego@...ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysctl: lockdep support for sysctl reference counting.
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:53:04 -0700
> ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>>
>> > So I merged these two patches. I designated them as to-be-merged via
>> > Alexey, with a Cc:Peter (IOW: wakey wakey ;))
>>
>> It is more sysctl than proc but whichever. As long as people aren't
>> blind sided at the last minute I'm fine.
>
> Yep. But keeping all fs/proc/ changes in Alexey's tree keeps things
> neat and is part of my secret maintainer-impressment plot.
Sounds like a plan. You work on that. I will work on undermining
the plot by breaking /proc into it's several separate filesystems.
> OK, fine, but to avoid confusion and to overtly announce this
> preference, please do add the From: Line?
Sounds like a plan. In truth I have been deleting that line from my
patches anyway.... It just seemed silly to have it in there when
the real From matched.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists