[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090331155614.8ad0c9b2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:56:14 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg soft limit (yet another new design) v1
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:19:02 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Nothing special boot options. My test was on VMware 2cpus/1.6GB memory.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder why swapout can be 0 on your test. Do you add some extra hooks to
> > > > kswapd ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nope.. no special hooks to kswapd. B never enters the RB-Tree and thus
> > > never hits the memcg soft limit reclaim path. kswapd can reclaim from
> > > it, but it grows back quickly.
> > Why grows back ? tasks in B sleeps ?
>
> Since B continuously consumes memory
>
Not sleep ?
In my test
1. malloc 1GB and touch all and sleep in B. Wait until the memory usage in B
goes up to 1024MB. This never wake up until 3.
2. run make in group A.
3. kill malloc program.
Then why why continuously consumes memory ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists