[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090331031523.fcf01cae.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:15:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Avishay Traeger <avishay@...il.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
open-osd <osd-dev@...n-osd.org>,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8 ver5] exofs: address_space_operations
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:04:36 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> >> +static int write_exec(struct page_collect *pcol)
> >> +{
> >> + struct exofs_i_info *oi = exofs_i(pcol->inode);
> >> + struct osd_obj_id obj = {pcol->sbi->s_pid,
> >> + pcol->inode->i_ino + EXOFS_OBJ_OFF};
> >> + struct osd_request *or = NULL;
> >> + struct page_collect *pcol_copy = NULL;
> >> + loff_t i_start = pcol->pg_first << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> >
> > bug. On 32-bit this shift will overflow prior to getting promoted to
> > 64-bit. Do:
> >
> > loff_t i_start = (loff_t)pcol->pg_first << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> >
>
> In that case I might make pcol->pg_first loff_t.
That would work.
> Why is inode->i_index not an loff_t then?
hm, what's i_index?
> Page-index <=> byte-offset, is done all the time 12 bits does not
> make a difference.
Page indices are 32-bit on 32-bit CPUs. File offsets are 64-bit. We
are careful to avoid the above overflow bug whenever the conversion
from page index to file size is made. Try
fgrep '(loff_t)' mm/*.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists