[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090331113832.GG16170@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:38:32 -0400
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, oleg@...hat.com,
adobriyan@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
roland@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] utrace-based ftrace "process" engine, v2
Hi -
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:17:42AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> [...] Right, from my POV something like utrace is desirable, since
> its basically a huge multiplexer for the debugger state, eventually
> allowing us to have multiple debuggers attached to the same process.
> [...]
Right.
> Then there is this little thing called frysk which uses it, no idea
> what kind of kernel space that needs, nor where it lives -- or for
> that matter, wth it really does ;-)
Frysk was to be a first user of such an improved ptrace(2) API in
order to do the sort of background / multiply-connected debugging, but
that project has been on indefinite hold for about a year. Instead,
there are experiments under way to extend gdb's backend for that
capability.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists