[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238566203.20906.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:10:03 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Linux MTD <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.29 2/2] MTD: support driver model updates
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 22:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > @@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ static int __init mxcnd_probe(struct pla
> > > mtd = &host->mtd;
> > > mtd->priv = this;
> > > mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > > + mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > Could this be done for all NANDs in nand_base.c instead?
>
> By adding the device as a parameter to nand_scan(),
> and presumably nand_scan_ident() ... which is a more
> invasive API change, and would require a "flag day"
> to convert all drivers.
>
> My default assumption for API changes is to avoid
> flag days. They can be done, yes, but I don't see
> a compelling reason to choose one here.
OK. MTD long needs sysfs, and I'm very happy with this
patches, even though they are not 100% complete. Good
start anyway.
Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists