[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e108260903312329u118a54bfn3107fdca4b3e2b1d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:29:19 +0200
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To: "Ross S. W. Walker" <RWalker@...allion.com>
Cc: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
iscsitarget-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
stgt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] [Scst-devel] ISCSI-SCST performance (withalso
IET and STGT data)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<RWalker@...allion.com> wrote:
> IET just needs to fix how it does it workload with CFQ which
> somehow SCST has overcome. Of course SCST tweaks the Linux kernel to
> gain some extra speed.
I'm not familiar with the implementation details of CFQ, but I know
that one of the changes between SCST 1.0.0 and SCST 1.0.1 is that the
default number of kernel threads of the scst_vdisk kernel module has
been increased to 5. Could this explain the performance difference
between SCST and IET for FILEIO and BLOCKIO ?
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists