lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e108260903312329u118a54bfn3107fdca4b3e2b1d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:29:19 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	"Ross S. W. Walker" <RWalker@...allion.com>
Cc:	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
	iscsitarget-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	stgt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] [Scst-devel] ISCSI-SCST performance (withalso 
	IET and STGT data)

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<RWalker@...allion.com> wrote:
> IET just needs to fix how it does it workload with CFQ which
> somehow SCST has overcome. Of course SCST tweaks the Linux kernel to
> gain some extra speed.

I'm not familiar with the implementation details of CFQ, but I know
that one of the changes between SCST 1.0.0 and SCST 1.0.1 is that the
default number of kernel threads of the scst_vdisk kernel module has
been increased to 5. Could this explain the performance difference
between SCST and IET for FILEIO and BLOCKIO ?

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ