linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: add fast lzo decompressor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1238674406.13249.24.camel@andreas-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:13:26 +0200
From:	Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Alain Knaff <alain@...ff.lu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: add fast lzo decompressor

On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 15:42 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I think if the cost is 40 ms once during boot on a slow platform, it's 
> worth unifying the two codebases.  I am *not* saying that I don't think 
> boot performance matters -- far be from it -- but I think this is 
> probably worth the reliability and maintainability advantages of having 
> a single piece of code if at all possible.
> 
> Of course, if you can figure out how to avoid that and still have the 
> code clean, then that's another matter.

Alrighty. I will merge the two functions and if that turns out ugly, go
with the safe one, and submit a new patchset. I'll be right back. :)

Cheers,
Andreas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/