[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238675410.13249.42.camel@andreas-desktop>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:30:10 +0200
From: Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Alain Knaff <alain@...ff.lu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: add fast lzo decompressor
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 10:40 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Sorry to jump in with a tangential issue, but I just noticed the
> thread
> and it reminded me of an issue :)
>
> Should the lzo code used via cryptoapi (I believe it's the same stuff)
> be SMP safe? I've tried to use it work TuxOnIce and get image corruption
> (test kernel is 64 bit). The same code works fine if I tell it to use
> LZF (which comes with TuxOnIce), no compression or, IIRC, work single
> threaded.
Do you compress or decompress data through the crypto API?
Neither function modifies the input data and there are no static or
global variables in use, so there shouldn't be a problem there.
They do however modify the destination length argument.
But most importantly, each compressor thread needs a private work buffer
allocated through lzo_init() in crypto/lzo.c. So, if you use the crypto
API to compress and share the crypto_tfm struct among threads, that
would explain your breakage.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists