linux-kernel - Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904031214260.4015@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30

On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that 
> you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing.

Gaah. I pulled it anyway. Today, I just can't find it in me to care about 
ocfs2 testing.

But please - keep this in mind. Even if the commit is old, when you rebase 
it, you really do move it into a whole new world order. And yes, it 
_usually_ works just fine. 

But to make sure, please do spend some time after setting up the tree to 
make sure that what I get really is something that you know is what I want 
to get.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/