[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090403203412.GD14571@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:34:12 -0700
From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:17:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that
> > you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing.
>
> Gaah. I pulled it anyway. Today, I just can't find it in me to care about
> ocfs2 testing.
Heh, thanks I guess :)
> But please - keep this in mind. Even if the commit is old, when you rebase
> it, you really do move it into a whole new world order. And yes, it
> _usually_ works just fine.
>
> But to make sure, please do spend some time after setting up the tree to
> make sure that what I get really is something that you know is what I want
> to get.
Point taken. Actually, the pre-rebased branch would have merged fine too, so
I really just rebased because of old habit, which isn't a good reason,
obviously.
Next time, I'll rebase early enough so that we can get a reasonable amount
of testing in.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists