[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440904031448yc6d499ckd9cb969ce136f477@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:48:31 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Yinghai, can you elaborate on exactly what type of interface you can
> imagine for modifying the distance for nodes through sysfs? It seems like
> you'd have to report the entire physical topology in one write, for which
> we currently don't have an interface for beyond pxms, instead of per-node
> distances to remote nodes.
acpi_numa_slit_init() in srat_64.c will have one copy (called
acpi_slit) of SLIT, if there is SLIT from ACPI.
so if numa is enabled, could expose that acpi_slit via sysfs for the
user to update it.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists