[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090403215351.GF11935@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:53:51 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:43:32PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > Who would be the right person (or list) to talk about this?
> >
> > Your BIOS vendor whose code reported the wrong values. Not that it matters
> > really on small systems.
> >
>
> The numactl --hardware values are coming directly from the sysfs per-node
> distance interface, so this may not be a result of erroneous BIOS data but
> rather the lack of a SLIT to describe the physical topology better.
That's the same really. Think about it. No SLIT on a NUMA system is a wrong
SLIT.
BTW there are more cases, like illegal slit which is also replaced
with 10/20.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists