[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904031448510.4329@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> acpi_numa_slit_init() in srat_64.c will have one copy (called
> acpi_slit) of SLIT, if there is SLIT from ACPI.
>
> so if numa is enabled, could expose that acpi_slit via sysfs for the
> user to update it.
>
Yeah, but in what format do you expect the user to update it? There is no
ACPI requirement that all nodes that have a remote distance of 20 to node
0, for instance, are local to themselves.
So you'll have to report the entire physical topology in one write to a
sysfs interface. We don't currently have such a format unless we are to
allow updating of the pxms.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists