[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090405035914.GA26896@hallyn.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 22:59:15 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't raise all privs on setuid-root file with fE set
(v2)
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Distributions face a backward compatibility problem with starting to use
> > file capabilities. For instance, removing setuid root from ping and
> > doing setcap cap_net_raw=pe means that booting with an older kernel
> > or one compiled without file capabilities means ping won't work for
> > non-root users.
> >
> > In order to replace the setuid root bit on a capability-unaware
> > program, one has to set the effective, or legacy, file capability,
> > which makes the capability effective immediately. This patch
> > uses the legacy bit as a queue to not automatically add full
>
> s/queue/cue/
Oops.
(I wonder whether this is worth resending?)
> > privilege to a setuid-root program.
> >
> > So, with this patch, an ordinary setuid-root program will run with
> > privilege. But if /bin/ping has both setuid-root and cap_net_raw in
> > fP and fE, then ping (when run by non-root user) will not run
> > with only cap_net_raw.
>
> Acked-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists