linux-kernel - Re: System deadlock on 2.6.24-rt20 (-rt27 panics on locking-api-selftests)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3efb10970904051200g4c725badp6d05092b70dd56a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:00:39 +0200
From:	Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: System deadlock on 2.6.24-rt20 (-rt27 panics on 
	locking-api-selftests)

Hello Thomas,

2009/4/5 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Remy Bohmer wrote:
>> > What happens if you disable the self tests ?
>>
>> The system boots and seems to run properly. We did not yet test for a
>> longer period of time, but the first looks are that the hangups we had
>> are gone now. But it would be good for the peace of mind if the
>> locking-selftest was working properly.
>
> Patches are welcome. :)
>
> Seriously, I'm not going to look into that as my limited capacity is
> focussed on 2.6.29-rt.

As it should be... :-)
I was not asking you to fix it, my apologies if you read it that way.
It is not that important to me, just a nice-to-have.


Kind Regards,

Remy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/