[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904061604410.8214@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
cc: Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> thing that we think people would be happiest with.
>
> I think "ordered" was a reasonable default, but that was at least partly
> because _both_ ordered and writeback sucked (partly in different ways).
>
> I do think we could make it a config option.
A patch _something_ like this.
A few notes:
- This is UNTESTED (of course)
- If I did this right, this _only_ overrides the data mode if it's not
explicitly specified on disk in the superblock mount options.
IOW, if you have done a
tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered
then this will _not_ override that. Only in the absense of any explicit
flags should this trigger and then make the choice be 'writeback'.
And just to be _extra_ backwards compatible, if you really want the old
behavior, and don't want to set the ordering flag explicitly, just answer
'y' to the EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED Kconfig question.
What do people think? Anybody want to test?
Linus
---
fs/ext3/Kconfig | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
fs/ext3/super.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/Kconfig b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
index 8e0cfe4..fb3c1a2 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
@@ -28,6 +28,25 @@ config EXT3_FS
To compile this file system support as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called ext3.
+config EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
+ bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3 (legacy option)"
+ depends on EXT3_FS
+ help
+ If a filesystem does not explicitly specify a data ordering
+ mode, and the journal capability allowed it, ext3 used to
+ historically default to 'data=ordered'.
+
+ That was a rather unfortunate choice, because it leads to all
+ kinds of latency problems, and the 'data=writeback' mode is more
+ appropriate these days.
+
+ You should probably always answer 'n' here, and if you really
+ want to use 'data=ordered' mode, set it in the filesystem itself
+ with 'tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered'.
+
+ But if you really want to enable the legacy default, you can do
+ so by answering 'y' to this question.
+
config EXT3_FS_XATTR
bool "Ext3 extended attributes"
depends on EXT3_FS
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index 9e5b8e3..599dbfe 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -44,6 +44,12 @@
#include "acl.h"
#include "namei.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
+ #define EXT3_MOUNT_DEFAULT_DATA_MODE EXT3_MOUNT_ORDERED_DATA
+#else
+ #define EXT3_MOUNT_DEFAULT_DATA_MODE EXT3_MOUNT_WRITEBACK_DATA
+#endif
+
static int ext3_load_journal(struct super_block *, struct ext3_super_block *,
unsigned long journal_devnum);
static int ext3_create_journal(struct super_block *, struct ext3_super_block *,
@@ -1919,7 +1925,7 @@ static int ext3_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
cope, else JOURNAL_DATA */
if (journal_check_available_features
(sbi->s_journal, 0, 0, JFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_REVOKE))
- set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, ORDERED_DATA);
+ set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, DEFAULT_DATA_MODE);
else
set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, JOURNAL_DATA);
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists