[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49DB0E7D.2070300@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:27:41 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question...
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> The real problem one is xen-netfront. Because 1) it is least random,
>> the attacker might be another VM 2) the VM is most in need of random
>> samples because it doesn't have real hardware.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I'm surprised Xen doesn't use virtio-rng. I guess it needs a special
> Xen paravirt driver for randomness.
Yes, sampling randomness in a PV driver is pretty pointless. We could
do the guest end of an entropy sink entirely in usermode, but at present
there's no dom0 support for an entropy source.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists