linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PROTO][PATCH -tip 0/7] kprobes: support jump optimization on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:10:56 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Satoshi Oshima <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>,
	systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PROTO][PATCH -tip 0/7] kprobes: support jump optimization
	on x86


* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:

> > But can we consider it as a small problem, assuming that kprobes 
> > are rarely intended for a massive use in once? I guess that 
> > usually, not a lot of functions are probed simultaneously.
> 
> Hm, yes and no, systemtap may use massive kprobes, because it 
> supports "wildcard" probes. However, optimizing in default may be 
> acceptable.

I'm curious: what is the biggest kprobe count you've ever seen, in 
the field? 1000? 10,000? 100,000? More?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/