linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] Convert CONFIG_SMP=y powerpc defconfigs to TREE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:10:05 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dipankar@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	manfred@...orfullife.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org, kernel@...tstofly.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	kyle@...artin.ca, deller@....de, davem@...emloft.net,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, jes@....com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] Convert CONFIG_SMP=y powerpc defconfigs to
	TREE_RCU.


* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > So no, there's no requirement to touch defconfigs - to the 
> > contrary: it has way too wide of a cross section with other 
> > trees to be really practical to carry in the RCU tree.
> 
> Sounds good to me!!!  So, is http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/3/561 
> sufficient, or should I repost?

I have queued up your patch:

 31c9a24: RCU: make treercu be default

... a week ago :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/