[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21081.1239214221@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:10:21 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> David, do you have a specific reason for defining
> arch_enter/leave_lazy_cpu_mode() in asm-frv/pgtable.h? It seems to have come
> in with 28936117af849b8c2fca664a41ea7651a0d99591 "FRV: Add some missng lazy
> MMU hooks for NOMMU mode". The intention was that asm-generic/pgtable.h
> should supply the default definitions; is that incompatible with nommu or
> something?
I don't remember. It was over two years ago. My guess is that it was to get
things to compile. Note that in NOMMU mode, <asm-generic/pgtable.h> is _not_
#included by <asm-frv/pgtable.h>.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists