[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090408175702.8a99c803.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:57:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] do not count frozen tasks toward load
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:45:12 -0500 Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com> wrote:
> Freezing tasks via the cgroup freezer causes the load average to climb
> because the freezer's current implementation puts frozen tasks in
> uninterruptible sleep (D state).
>
> Some applications which perform job-scheduling functions consult the
> load average when making decisions. If a cgroup is frozen, the load
> average does not provide a useful measure of the system's utilization
> to such applications. This is especially inconvenient if the job
> scheduler employs the cgroup freezer as a mechanism for preempting low
> priority jobs. Contrast this with using SIGSTOP for the same purpose:
> the stopped tasks do not count toward system load.
>
> Change task_contributes_to_load() to return false if the task is
> frozen. This results in /proc/loadavg behavior that better meets
> users' expectations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 011db2f..f8af167 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ extern unsigned long long time_sync_thresh;
> #define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task) \
> ((task->state & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) != 0)
> #define task_contributes_to_load(task) \
> - ((task->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) != 0)
> + ((task->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) != 0 && \
> + (task->flags & PF_FROZEN) == 0)
>
> #define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
> do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)
Looks OK to me. It should perhaps use !frozen(task), but the includes
are mucked up.
I suppose we should fix this in -stable too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists