linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] do not count frozen tasks toward load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1239238567.14883.2.camel@nigel-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:56:07 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-lkml@...a.org.au>
To:	Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] do not count frozen tasks toward load

Hi.

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 19:45 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Freezing tasks via the cgroup freezer causes the load average to climb
> because the freezer's current implementation puts frozen tasks in
> uninterruptible sleep (D state).
> 
> Some applications which perform job-scheduling functions consult the
> load average when making decisions.  If a cgroup is frozen, the load
> average does not provide a useful measure of the system's utilization
> to such applications.  This is especially inconvenient if the job
> scheduler employs the cgroup freezer as a mechanism for preempting low
> priority jobs.  Contrast this with using SIGSTOP for the same purpose:
> the stopped tasks do not count toward system load.
> 
> Change task_contributes_to_load() to return false if the task is
> frozen.  This results in /proc/loadavg behavior that better meets
> users' expectations.

Sounds great to me - TuxOnIce has had code to save and restore the load
average for ages because of the same issue. This is much better because
it gets to the root of the problem.

I'll apply it here, give it a test and hopefully give you an Acked-by
shortly.

Regards,

Nigel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/