[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090410121515.GP21506@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:15:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LTP <ltp-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: choose to continue lock debugging despite
taint
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Lockdep is disabled after any kernel taints. This might be
> convenient to ignore bad locking issues which sources come from
> outside the kernel tree. Nevertheless, it might be a frustrating
> experience for the staging developers or anyone who might develop
> a kernel that happens to be tainted.
Good point. Not having lockdep coverage for drivers/staging/ just
prolongs their transition - not good.
But instead of this:
> void add_taint(unsigned flag)
> {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_IGNORE_TAINT
> /*
> * Can't trust the integrity of the kernel anymore.
> * We don't call directly debug_locks_off() because the issue
> @@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ void add_taint(unsigned flag)
> */
> if (xchg(&debug_locks, 0))
> printk(KERN_WARNING "Disabling lockdep due to kernel taint\n");
> +#endif
I'd suggest to not do the debug_locks_off() call if TAINT_CRAP. I.e.
something like:
if (!(flag & TAINT_CRAP) && debug_locks_off())
printk(...);
will do the trick.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists