[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090413190747V.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:07:58 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, bharrosh@...asas.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] scsi: replace custom rq mapping with
blk_rq_map_kern_sgl()
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:38:23 +0900
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >> I thought that was agreed and done? What is left to do for that to go
> >> in.
> >
> > I've converted all the users (sg, st, osst). Nothing is left. So we
> > don't need this.
>
> Yeah, pulled it. Okay, so we can postpone diddling with request
> mapping for now. I'll re-post fixes only from this and the previous
> patchset and proceed with other patchsets.
To be honest, I don't think that we can clean up the block
mapping. For example, blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc() in your patchset
doesn't look cleanup to me. It's just moving a hack from ide to the
block (well, I have to admit that I did the same thing when I
converted sg/st/osst...).
We can't have good API with insane users. I don't want to ask this
publicly but don't we have any chance to merge the old ide code and
libata?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists