[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090413125912.GA16337@liondog.tnic>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:59:12 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, bharrosh@...asas.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] scsi: replace custom rq mapping with
blk_rq_map_kern_sgl()
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 07:07:58PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:38:23 +0900
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > >> I thought that was agreed and done? What is left to do for that to go
> > >> in.
> > >
> > > I've converted all the users (sg, st, osst). Nothing is left. So we
> > > don't need this.
> >
> > Yeah, pulled it. Okay, so we can postpone diddling with request
> > mapping for now. I'll re-post fixes only from this and the previous
> > patchset and proceed with other patchsets.
>
> To be honest, I don't think that we can clean up the block
> mapping. For example, blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc() in your patchset
> doesn't look cleanup to me. It's just moving a hack from ide to the
> block (well, I have to admit that I did the same thing when I
> converted sg/st/osst...).
Well, since blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc() is going to be used only in
ide-cd (driver needs it to queue a sense request from within the irq
handler) and since it is considered a hack I could try to move it out of
the irq handler and do away only with blk_rq_map_kern() if that is more
of an agreeable solution?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists