| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49E46E73.8020703@wpkg.org> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:07:31 +0200 From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org> To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net> CC: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, iscsitarget-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, stgt@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO) Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb: >> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system? >> >>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If >>> so, you should try with CFQ as well. >> >> I used CFQ. > > You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a > noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt. I didn't apply this one. I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to 2.6.26.8 kernel (perhaps in a trivial way, I didn't check). -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists