[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E4D17E.8020602@vlnb.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:10:06 +0400
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>
CC: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
stgt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between
different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)
Tomasz Chmielewski, on 04/14/2009 03:07 PM wrote:
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:
>
>>> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system?
>>>
>>>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If
>>>> so, you should try with CFQ as well.
>>> I used CFQ.
>> You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a
>> noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt.
>
> I didn't apply this one.
>
> I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28
> and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to 2.6.26.8 kernel (perhaps in a
> trivial way, I didn't check).
Yes, io_context patch for 2.6.26.x kernels doesn't exist, because it
isn't clear if it has the necessary functionality.
But it's worth for you to upgrade to 2.6.27.x. Have you seen
http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt?
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists