[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0904151146210.3072-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> Why should every user suffer a slower boot and a poorer resume time ?
>
> Instead make the root fs mounting look like this
>
>
> while(my_rootfs_hasnt_appeared_and_i_am_sad()) {
> wait_on(&new_disk_discovery);
> }
>
> and poke the queue whenever we add a relevant device.
>
> That way if you are booting off an initrd you can finish the SATA probe
> in parallel to getting userspace ticking over.
>
> On what is nowdays essentially a hot plug system it all needs turning
> this way up - eg RAID volumes should assemble and come online as the
> drives are discovered not at some fixed point later in userspace.
Indeed, something like this should also be used for
resume-from-hibernation, to wait for the swap device.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists