[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E60219.9080103@rtr.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:49:45 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> Why should every user suffer a slower boot and a poorer resume time ?
>>
>> Instead make the root fs mounting look like this
>>
>>
>> while(my_rootfs_hasnt_appeared_and_i_am_sad()) {
>> wait_on(&new_disk_discovery);
>> }
>>
>> and poke the queue whenever we add a relevant device.
>>
>> That way if you are booting off an initrd you can finish the SATA probe
>> in parallel to getting userspace ticking over.
>>
>> On what is nowdays essentially a hot plug system it all needs turning
>> this way up - eg RAID volumes should assemble and come online as the
>> drives are discovered not at some fixed point later in userspace.
>
> Indeed, something like this should also be used for
> resume-from-hibernation, to wait for the swap device.
..
It just needs a way to set a finite timeout, so that server room
equipment can auto-panic-reboot and try again if a device has died.
-ml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists