linux-kernel - IMA and fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15909.1239887985@jrobl>
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:19:45 +0900
From:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
To:	zohar@...ibm.com
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IMA and fs

I have found (at least) two issues about IMA.

1.
Calling stack
- kmem_cache_alloc(iint_cache, GFP_KERNEL)
- ima_inode_alloc()
- inode_init_always()
- xfs_iget_cache_hit()
- xfs_iget()

xfs_iget() holds spinlock before xfs_iget_cache_hit(), and
ima_inode_alloc() cannot use GFP_KERNEL.

2.
ima_path_check() seems to be necessary before every opening a file.
In 2.6.30-rc1, IMA produces lots of messages and stack trace when NFSD
opens a file. 
Does nfsd_open() need to to call ima_path_check()?

J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/