linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler regression: Too frequent timer interrupts(?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1239951613.23397.4107.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:00:13 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler regression: Too frequent timer interrupts(?)

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 15:53 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Since 2.6.22 the Linux scheduler interrupts programs with increasing
> frequency. The interrupts cause run time variances that are affecting HPC
> jobs. Various low latency jobs show increasing runtimes because of these
> additional interrupts by the scheduler.
> 
> In the following test a simple program was run that continually retrieves
> TSC and measures the times between the TSC retrievals. A run time variance
> is noted whenever the time between two TSC retrievals is larger than 1
> usec (on a 3.3Ghz Xeon box quad cores dual processor). The numbers given
> are the interrupts occuring in a 10 second measurement period. The tests
> can be downloaded from http://gentwo.org/ll .
> 
> 
> Kernel		Test 1	Test 2	Test 3	Variances(SUM)
> 2.6.22		383	540	667	1590
> 2.6.23		2738	2019	2303	7060
> 2.6.24		2503	573	583	3659
> 2.6.25		302	359	241	902
> 2.6.26		2503	2501	2503	7507
> 2.6.27		2502	2503	2478	7483
> 2.6.28		2502	2504	2502	7508
> 2.6.29		2502	2490	2503	7495
> 2.6.30-rc2	2504	2503	2502	7509
> 
> The kernel was compiled with high res timer support and a HZ of 250.
> 
> The 2.6.22 kernel has only about 38.3 disruptions per second. That likely
> means that HRTIMER is able to eliminate the timer interrupt.

This has never been true afaikt, as long as we have a task running, we
take the interrupt, I just looked at the .22 code and that certainly
expects the scheduler_tick() to be called when there is a running
process.

Also, look at /proc/interrupts if you want to determine interrupt
frequency.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/