linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix discard requests accounting in the diskstats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090417090851.GO4593@kernel.dk>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:08:52 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
Cc:	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jmarchan@...hat.com" <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix discard requests accounting in the diskstats

On Fri, Apr 17 2009, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 08:55 +0100, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > On Friday 17 April 2009 12:19:12 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 17 2009, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > > > When 2 discard requests are merged, the stats gets updated, but we do not
> > > > update statistics normally when a discard request is issued or completed.
> > > > For example the in_flight counter would be decremented when 2 discard
> > > > requests are merged, but it was not at all incremented when they were
> > > > issued, and in_flight counter will not be decremented, when they are
> > > > completed as well.
> > > >
> > > > This patch fixes this by adding discard requests to the statistics.
> > >
> > > This needs rebasing on top of this one:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/16/159
> > >
> > > whenever that gets resubmitted as a proper, working patch.
> > >
> > 
> > Ok. I will resend after Jerome resubmits that patch.
> 
> There are more interesting issues with discard requests and elevators
> for now, such as the fact that elevators only actually prevent write
> requests from crossing each other on the queue if the {start,end} range
> precisely matches, not merely if they happen to overlap.
> 
> So all discard requests are submitted as soft barriers for now anyway.

But they are still marked mergeable, so the accounting should be correct
regardless.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/