[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090423125040.57db9968.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, David.Woodhouse@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix discard requests accounting in the diskstats
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:44:49 +0530
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de> wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -667,7 +667,9 @@ static inline void blk_clear_queue_full(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
> (REQ_NOMERGE | REQ_STARTED | REQ_HARDBARRIER | REQ_SOFTBARRIER)
> #define rq_mergeable(rq) \
> (!((rq)->cmd_flags & RQ_NOMERGE_FLAGS) && \
> - (blk_discard_rq(rq) || blk_fs_request((rq))))
> + (blk_discard_rq(rq) || blk_fs_request(rq)))
> +#define rq_accountable(rq) \
> + (blk_discard_rq(rq) || blk_fs_request(rq))
Both these macros reference their argument multiple times and are
potentially buggy and/or inefficient if passed an expression with
side-effects.
There was (afaict) no reason for them to have been implemented as
macros.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists