lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-9b94b3a19b13e094c10f65f24bc358f6ffe4eacd@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:27:36 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	andreas.herrmann3@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/cpu] x86: fixup numa_node information for AMD CPU northbridge functions

Commit-ID:  9b94b3a19b13e094c10f65f24bc358f6ffe4eacd
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/9b94b3a19b13e094c10f65f24bc358f6ffe4eacd
Author:     Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:07:46 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:12:36 +0200

x86: fixup numa_node information for AMD CPU northbridge functions

Currently the numa_node attribute for these PCI devices is 0 (it
corresponds to the numa_node for PCI bus 0). This is not a big issue
but incorrect.

This inconsistency can be fixed by reading the node number from CPU
NB function 0.

[ Impact: fill in dev->numa_node information, to optimize DMA allocations ]

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Cc: jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
LKML-Reference: <20090417100746.GG16198@...erich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
index e95022e..94ad0c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
@@ -493,5 +493,42 @@ void force_hpet_resume(void)
 		break;
 	}
 }
+#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PCI) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
+/* Set correct numa_node information for AMD NB functions */
+static void __init quirk_amd_nb_node(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *nb_ht;
+	unsigned int devfn;
+	u32 val;
+
+	devfn = PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0);
+	nb_ht = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, devfn);
+	if (!nb_ht)
+		return;
+
+	pci_read_config_dword(nb_ht, 0x60, &val);
+	set_dev_node(&dev->dev, val & 7);
+	pci_dev_put(dev);
+}
 
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB_ADDRMAP,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB_MEMCTL,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB_MISC,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_HT,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_MAP,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_DRAM,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_MISC,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_LINK,
+			quirk_amd_nb_node);
 #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ