linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] AHCI updates: Marvell AHCI PATA works; pata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090417180316.GA7134@sci.fi>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:03:16 +0300
From:	Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] AHCI updates: Marvell AHCI PATA works;
	pata_marvell fate?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:50:31AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Marvell PATA on 6121 and similar chips should also work, but that hasn't
> > yet been tested.  Here's the full list of what still needs testing:
> > 
> > - master + slave devices
> > - ATAPI
> > - 6121 (6123? others?)
> 
> LBA48
> 
> 
> > 
> > Also, there is the open question of how to deal with pata_marvell
> > co-existence
> 
> I think for the moment make PATA support by AHCI a config option and as
> soon as we trust it we can get rid of the option and of pata_marvell.

How does this relate to 6101 which is a PATA only controller? Would that
continue to use pata_marvell or does this new stuff support such things
too?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
syrjala@....fi
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/