linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] [MTD] Add MEMERASE64 ioctl for >4GiB devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a95a62fe0904180921w3ac0128et7a543742f5734d64@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:21:28 -0700
From:	Kevin Cernekee <kpc.mtd@...il.com>
To:	dedekind@...radead.org
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Linux MTD <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [MTD] Add MEMERASE64 ioctl for >4GiB devices

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Artem Bityutskiy
<dedekind@...radead.org> wrote:
> Kevin, are you going to re-send patches 2-4, taking into account
> Arnd's and Andrew's suggestions?

For Arnd's suggestion, I posted a followup patch here:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-April/025269.html

Andrew brought up two issues: [MTD] in the subject line, and
linewrapping.  I am assuming that he fixed these himself since he
pulled all five patches (originals + followup) into the -mm tree.

Should I fix and repost the set anyway?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/