linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] [MTD] Add MEMERASE64 ioctl for >4GiB devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:47:11 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To:	Kevin Cernekee <kpc.mtd@...il.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Linux MTD <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [MTD] Add MEMERASE64 ioctl for >4GiB devices

On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Artem Bityutskiy
> <dedekind@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Kevin, are you going to re-send patches 2-4, taking into account
> > Arnd's and Andrew's suggestions?
> 
> For Arnd's suggestion, I posted a followup patch here:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-April/025269.html
> 
> Andrew brought up two issues: [MTD] in the subject line, and
> linewrapping.  I am assuming that he fixed these himself since he
> pulled all five patches (originals + followup) into the -mm tree.
> 
> Should I fix and repost the set anyway?

No, I just missed that patch. Pushed your patches to l2-mtd-2.6.git.
Will ping dwmw2 about this. I also checked that your patches at
least do not break MTD for UBI/UBIFS. Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/