lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49EB45A3.4040402@comcast.net>
Date:	Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:39:15 -0400
From:	John Richard Moser <nigelenki@...cast.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Allocate on Flush in vfat?

Would it be completely unpossible, in theory, to add allocate-on-flush 
to vfat?  I don't see a reason why, it's just a driver semantic and not 
a disk data structure semantic...

I'm looking at a USB stick copying gigs of data and thinking about this. 
I have doubts there's any real world advantage, although in the same 
theory you could backport AOF to ext3/2 or you couldn't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ