[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090419105224.7ededc1d@hobbes>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:52:24 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:06:15 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > Cool! Yinghai, mind (re-)sending the latest version of the
> > remaining two patches, so what we can pick this up into the x86
> > tree and get it tested? I'd say it's for v2.6.31. (unless someone
> > can think of a strong reason to do this sooner.)
>
> Hm, there's one patch in that lot that does:
>
> drivers/pci/bus.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 40
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 44
> insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Which should go via the PCI tree.
>
> I can set up an isolated x86/pci-gap topic that i'll send to Jesse
> to pull (once it looks to be stable), as the other patches modify
> the e820 code which we'd like to test in the x86 tree first.
>
> Jesse, Linus, Yinghai, does that look like a good plan to you?
Yep, that's fine with me.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists