[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090419090615.GA30631@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:06:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Cool! Yinghai, mind (re-)sending the latest version of the
> remaining two patches, so what we can pick this up into the x86
> tree and get it tested? I'd say it's for v2.6.31. (unless someone
> can think of a strong reason to do this sooner.)
Hm, there's one patch in that lot that does:
drivers/pci/bus.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Which should go via the PCI tree.
I can set up an isolated x86/pci-gap topic that i'll send to Jesse
to pull (once it looks to be stable), as the other patches modify
the e820 code which we'd like to test in the x86 tree first.
Jesse, Linus, Yinghai, does that look like a good plan to you?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists