[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904192055.04213.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:55:02 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tim Abbott <tabbott@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: use module notifier for function tracer
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:48:31 am Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> Impact: fix and clean up
>
> The hooks in the module code for the function tracer must be called
> before any of that module code runs. The function tracer hooks
> modify the module (replacing calls to mcount to nops). If the code
> is executed while the change occurs, then the CPU can take a GPF.
>
> To handle the above with a bit of paranoia, I originally implemented
> the hooks as calls directly from the module code.
>
> After examining the notifier calls, it looks as though the start up
> notify is called before any of the module's code is executed. This makes
> the use of the notify safe with ftrace.
Hi Steven,
Unfortunately not: we do parse_args, which can call into the module code.
(Though it shouldn't do anything "significant", as it won't get a chance to
clean up if module load fails later).
I think you need to do something else in general. Share the module_mutex for
the ftrace code? The ksplice guys have a similar issue, so maybe we should
generalize this into a "kernel_text" mutex?
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists