[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49ED2088.9090703@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:25:28 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....EDU>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....EDU>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for compiling with -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Are there any advantages outside of the size things?
>
> Do we end up packing data better?
>
> I'd like to have some more champions of this code, in other words.
>
> I'd be ok with merging it, but I haven't really gotten a strong feeling
> that anybody is going to enable it or use it.
>
It may be a long haul to get people to actually use it, but there is a
fairly major advantage near the end, and that is that we can structure
the source code in a way that makes sense for reading it, rather than
what will end up using what.
Assuming it does work correctly.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists