[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904210349.41463.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:49:41 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Abbott <tabbott@....edu>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....edu>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....edu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for compiling with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 03:25, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Are there any advantages outside of the size things?
> >
> > Do we end up packing data better?
> >
> > I'd like to have some more champions of this code, in other words.
> >
> > I'd be ok with merging it, but I haven't really gotten a strong feeling
> > that anybody is going to enable it or use it.
> >
>
> It may be a long haul to get people to actually use it, but there is a
> fairly major advantage near the end, and that is that we can structure
> the source code in a way that makes sense for reading it, rather than
> what will end up using what.
>
> Assuming it does work correctly.
It's not like it's known to be broken. I use it all the time
for the stuff I build.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists