[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090423170253.6b6dfd21@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:02:53 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hcegtvedt@...el.com,
vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, david-b@...bell.net,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with irqs enabled
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:51:41 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> The IRQF_DISABLED fixes would be better regardless of the
> rtc_update_irq() API change. And local_irq_disable fixes are not
> needed (and should be reverted) if the API change was acked, but no
> harm for short term fix.
As I said in my last email to Andrew, I think we can call
rtc_update_irq with irqs enabled and we don't probably need
any IRQF_ to request_irq .
Are you willing to make some tests in that direction with your
drivers?
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists