[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090423184024.39402a8f@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:40:24 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc: vapier.adi@...il.com, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, david-b@...bell.net,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with
irqs enabled
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:30:58 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com> wrote:
> for the blackfin you should just check if
> > you have locking issues in your irq routine
>
> the Blackfin driver calls rtc_update_irq() from its IRQ handler and
> the handler is not registered with IRQF_DISABLED. it makes more sense
> to me to fix rtc_update_irq() than require all RTC drivers to register
> with IRQF_DISABLED. especially in my case as the Blackfin driver
> itself doesnt need any locks.
I agree. rtc_update_irq is not problematic by itself, it just takes
locks that other parts of the driver should take appropriately.
For example, if you take irq_lock with irqs enabled you
will get in trouble. blackfin seems ok, for the other
drivers we need to verify this.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists